Peptable

Comparison

GHK-Cu vs SS-31

Also see:

GHK-CuSS-31

Function

While GHK-Cu acts as a tissue-remodeling and wound-healing signal, enhancing skin regeneration, angiogenesis, and repair while reducing inflammation and oxidative damage in experimental models31383, SS-31 improves mitochondrial bioenergetics, reduces oxidative stress, and shows protective effects in models of ischemia-reperfusion, neurodegeneration, and other mitochondrial disorders4637137.

Mechanism

While GHK-Cu works as an endogenous tripeptide, Gly-His-Lys, that chelates Cu²⁺ and modulates gene expression, stimulating collagen, elastin, proteoglycan, and glycosaminoglycan synthesis while exerting antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects31383, SS-31 is a mitochondria-targeted tetrapeptide, d-Arg-dimethylTyr-Lys-Phe-NH2, that selectively binds cardiolipin in the inner mitochondrial membrane, stabilizing cristae structure, improving electron transport, and reducing ROS production4637137143.

Receptor

GHK-Cu

Not clearly established in the current dataset.

SS-31

Cardiolipin-rich inner mitochondrial membrane; interacts with cardiolipin and associated mitochondrial proteins rather than a classical cell-surface receptor46137143

Organism or Origin

GHK-Cu

Naturally occurring human plasma peptide also found in saliva and urine313

SS-31

Fully synthetic Szeto–Schiller tetrapeptide; not encoded in the genome4637

Gene

GHK-Cu

Not assigned in the current dataset.

SS-31

Not assigned in the current dataset.

Summary

The clearest overlap between GHK-Cu and SS-31 is that both converge around Signaling modulator. Both are often discussed in Aging and longevity contexts, while GHK-Cu is more of a signal peptide and Matrikine and SS-31 is better described as a mitochondrial peptide. Both appear to work through Signaling modulator, but the functional emphasis still separates, with GHK-Cu leaning toward Collagen and elastin stimulation and Tissue repair and healing and SS-31 leaning toward Mitochondrial function modulation and Neuroprotection and cognition. GHK-Cu has a more natural endogenous origin, while SS-31 is closer to synthetic design background and their development context also differs, with GHK-Cu cosmetic grade while SS-31 is in Clinical phase 2. SS-31 incorporates d-amino acid substitution and amidation features that are not part of GHK-Cu, while their sequence patterns also diverge, with GHK-Cu showing protein-mimetic sequence features and SS-31 showing cationic amphipathic features.

Sources

3GHK-Cu: Structure And Mechanism Of Action, https://sportstechnologylabs.com/ghk-cu-structure-and-mechanism-of-action/
13What is GHK-Cu and How Does it Work?, https://www.peptidesciences.com/peptide-research/what-is-ghk-cu-and-how
83What is GHK-Cu | Peptides for sale, https://polarispeptides.com/what-is-ghk-cu/
46Discovery of novel SS-31 (d-Arg-dimethylTyr-Lys-Phe-NH2 ... - PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11409442/
56Discovery of novel SS-31 (d-Arg-dimethylTyr-Lys-Phe-NH2 ..., https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ra/d4ra05517a
137Mitochondrial protein interaction landscape of SS-31 | PNAS, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2002250117
143SS-31 Peptide: Mitochondrial Repair for Energy and Longevity, https://revolutionhealth.org/blogs/news/peptide-therapy-ss-31