Peptable

Comparison

Matrixyl vs SS-31

Also see:

MatrixylSS-31

Function

While Matrixyl is a widely used cosmetic peptide with evidence of stimulating extracellular matrix synthesis and reducing wrinkle appearance in skin-care formulations48, SS-31 improves mitochondrial bioenergetics, reduces oxidative stress, and shows protective effects in models of ischemia-reperfusion, neurodegeneration, and other mitochondrial disorders4637137.

Mechanism

While Matrixyl works as a palmitoylated pentapeptide, Pal-Lys-Thr-Thr-Lys-Ser (Pal-KTTKS), that acts as a matrikine, signaling to dermal fibroblasts to increase production of collagen, elastin, fibronectin, and other ECM components4858, SS-31 is a mitochondria-targeted tetrapeptide, d-Arg-dimethylTyr-Lys-Phe-NH2, that selectively binds cardiolipin in the inner mitochondrial membrane, stabilizing cristae structure, improving electron transport, and reducing ROS production4637137143.

Receptor

Matrixyl

Not clearly established in the current dataset.

SS-31

Cardiolipin-rich inner mitochondrial membrane; interacts with cardiolipin and associated mitochondrial proteins rather than a classical cell-surface receptor46137143

Organism or Origin

Matrixyl

Synthetic lipopeptide derived from a collagen I C-terminal fragment sequence5158

SS-31

Fully synthetic Szeto–Schiller tetrapeptide; not encoded in the genome4637

Gene

Matrixyl

Not assigned in the current dataset.

SS-31

Not assigned in the current dataset.

Summary

Matrixyl and SS-31 are noticeably different, with limited direct overlap in their usual biological context. Their typical research and application settings separate fairly clearly: Matrixyl is more often discussed in the realm of Dermatology and aesthetics, whereas SS-31 is more often associated with the realm of Aging and longevity and Cardiovascular health. They also influence different molecular systems, with Matrixyl tracking more closely to Extracellular matrix proteins while SS-31 centers more on Mitochondrial membrane. Both are synthetic in origin and their development context also differs, with Matrixyl cosmetic grade while SS-31 is in Clinical phase 2. Matrixyl takes the form of a peptide conjugate, whereas SS-31 is closer to a linear peptide, Matrixyl carries palmitoylation features, while SS-31 instead reflects d-amino acid substitution and amidation changes; while their sequence patterns also diverge, with Matrixyl showing protein-mimetic sequence features and SS-31 showing cationic amphipathic features.

Related articles

No related articles are linked to these peptides yet.

Sources

48Palmitoyl Pentapeptide-4 - R&D PEPTIDE.ONE, https://rnd.peptide.one/product/palmitoyl-pentapeptide-4-pal-lys-thr-thr-lys-ser/
51[PDF] Acetyl tetrapeptide-5 - SkinMiles, https://skinmiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Matriskin-Ingredients.pdf
58[PDF] Safety Assessment of Myristoyl Pentapeptide-4, Palmitoyl ..., https://www.cir-safety.org/sites/default/files/Pentapeptide%20Ingredients.pdf
46Discovery of novel SS-31 (d-Arg-dimethylTyr-Lys-Phe-NH2 ... - PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11409442/
56Discovery of novel SS-31 (d-Arg-dimethylTyr-Lys-Phe-NH2 ..., https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ra/d4ra05517a
137Mitochondrial protein interaction landscape of SS-31 | PNAS, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2002250117
143SS-31 Peptide: Mitochondrial Repair for Energy and Longevity, https://revolutionhealth.org/blogs/news/peptide-therapy-ss-31